Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> app2(app2(cons, x), app2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x)))

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> app2(app2(cons, x), app2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x)))

Q is empty.

The TRS is non-overlapping. Hence, we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> app2(app2(cons, x), app2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(app2(iterate, x0), x1)


Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(f, x)
APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x))
APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(cons, x)
APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(app2(cons, x), app2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> app2(app2(cons, x), app2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(app2(iterate, x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(f, x)
APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x))
APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(cons, x)
APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(app2(cons, x), app2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> app2(app2(cons, x), app2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(app2(iterate, x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPAfsSolverProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(f, x)
APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> app2(app2(cons, x), app2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(app2(iterate, x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using an argument filtering and a montonic ordering, at least one Dependency Pair of this SCC can be strictly oriented.

APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(f, x)
Used argument filtering: APP2(x1, x2)  =  x1
app2(x1, x2)  =  app1(x2)
iterate  =  iterate
Used ordering: Quasi Precedence: trivial 


↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPAfsSolverProof
                ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> APP2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(app2(iterate, f), x) -> app2(app2(cons, x), app2(app2(iterate, f), app2(f, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(app2(iterate, x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.